Frozen Grounds: The NHL's Topic of the Day

NEW YORK, NY - MAY 23: Henrik Lundqvist #30 of the New York Rangers prepares to take on the New Jersey Devils in Game Five of the Eastern Conference Final during the 2012 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Madison Square Garden on May 23, 2012 in New York City. (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

The CBC has announced programming, aimed at women who aren't sports fans, to be broadcasted opposite the Stanley Cup Final games. And the nature of this programming has some hockey fans very upset.

NOTE: Taking a brief break from NHL lessons, here's what people in and around hockey are talking about today. This is my post from my SB Nation hockey site, Raw Charge. I realize that this show is actually geared towards non-hockey fans, but as that's an even more controversial topic, I decided to play it safe and stick with the female hockey fan point of view.

The Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) announced yesterday that it would be airing a little something for those hockey widows during the Stanley Cup Final. Now, that sort of thing doesn't really affect us here in the states, but there's been a lot of outrage over the decision. This show is being described as, "Sex and the City meets ESPN, with banter "from a woman's point of view" ".

(You can visit the blog, While the Men Watch , to get an idea of what this show may be like.)

The problem isn't that this is going on. In fact, the CBC ought to be applauded for even trying to reach out to women who happen to not like sports. The real problem is that they're going about it the entirely wrong way, and it's in a way that die hard female hockey fans find offensive.

Perhaps it is the fact that being a female and a hockey fan is a novelty that makes this practice so widespread, but the greater problem here is that as a female hockey fan, a female hockey fan is defined as female first and hockey fan second. The writers of While the Men Watch perpetrate this stereotype and this is the greatest folly of their endeavor, not , as I would like to argue, the way that they watch hockey.

-While the Men Watch; A Terrible Idea

This type of thing can be considered the TV and/or blogging equivalent to the pink, bedazzled hockey jersey. It works for a very few women, but not the majority. So it's a good idea in theory, but a bad idea in execution.

And that's what's going on - and has been going on - here with hockey and the NHL. This isn't a singular instance of misunderstanding what women want out of the sport. It's just another poorly thought out attempt at trying to be helpful.

Sure, some women will love this - and good for them. Have at it. Enjoy. But for the rest, it's not at all what they want.

What female hockey fans want is to be treated like...well, fans. It doesn't have to be anything all that extravagant - just stuff that fits a smaller frame than men, and fits our shape, when it comes to clothing merchandise. Essentially, that's pretty much it. Don't market anything specifically for us necessarily; what works for the men pretty much works for us, too. Just let us be equals, and we'll be happy.

Marsha Boyd, an Edmonton Oilers season-ticket holder, agreed and said she has a group of female friends who love hockey just as much as the guys do.

"It’s quite insulting to anyone who’s a woman and a sports fan, as if we don’t exist or we can’t possibly enjoy hockey without looking at pretty boys," she said.

-CBC defends decision to air alternate female commentary during Stanley Cup final

Now, I'm not outraged here. Hockey is trying to reach out; they really are. But they're not asking what female fans want first, or are even seemingly interested in their feedback. They're just making their best guess and hope it makes the majority of female fans happy. It's classic of at least NHL marketing - do something, then throw it at the wall and see if it sticks. Has no one ever heard of focus groups?

Now, I happen to do an online hockey show with my friend Su Ring, and we talk about all levels of hockey. There is no Sex and the City aspect to it at all, nor do we even want that. The female angle is perhaps just being a bit more empathetic, that's it.

In fact, we even interview hockey types about hockey. Last weekend, for instance, we interviewed former Tampa Bay Lightning defenseman - now current Seattle Thunderbirds' (WHL) assistant coach - Darren Rumble. I invite you to take a listen to it, and see if you think women need this sex aspect in order to keep things interesting. You can find it at CCPT Hockey Show on BlogTalkRadio.

...And now back to your regularly scheduled blogging....

Trending Discussions

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join SB Nation Seattle

You must be a member of SB Nation Seattle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SB Nation Seattle. You should read them.

Join SB Nation Seattle

You must be a member of SB Nation Seattle to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at SB Nation Seattle. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.